Skip to main content

Reason # 1147 To Enroll Your Kids In Private School

Here's a brief story I'd like to relate while it's still fresh in my mind; typically, my articles are 3-4 pages, and quite frankly, it's far too hot to create such a magnum opus tonight. So, I offer you an ultra-condensed version of a disturbing event which took place this past Friday.

Actually, to set the stage, we have to go back to the previous Friday, when the Superintendent of our District happened to be visiting our school. To explain why he was there, I'd have to go over the one-page cap I've set for myself for this article, so suffice it to say that he was trying to do in late May what he should have been doing all year long – namely, his job.

While he is visiting, a student decides it would be a real hoot to throw a glass bottle out of a third-floor classroom window. And since the universe is not without a sense of humor, the bottle travels along a trajectory which terminates at the windshield of a brand-new car parked on the street outside. A car that just happens to be owned by the Superintendent. Personally, I love when things like this happen.

Soon, there is a flurry of activity. The student, a girl, (only by the most technical definition of the word, however) is quickly identified and pulled into the main office for questioning. The Superintendent calls the police. The Principal calls the girl's parents. Statements are given and recorded, the police pack up their fingerprint kit (yes, they really used a fingerprint kit), and the Superintendent limps his car into the nearest Safelite repair facility. His last words before leaving? "I want that girl suspended!" Picture a 5'5" tall balding Jewish man in a $50 suit screaming that line in a hallway while sweat streams down his face, and you will have perfectly captured the essence of what it is like to experience working for the DOE on a daily basis: Anger, frustration, short, loud idiots.

Ok, now stay with me on this one. There are two types of suspensions within the NYC DOE: A Principal's suspension, also known as "In House" in which the student is removed from class and must spend up to five days in a separate classroom, (staffed by a teacher) isolated from the other students. Usually this type of suspension is perused for garden-variety infractions – cursing, cutting, interrupting the "educational process," etc. The other type of suspension, for more serious infractions, is known as a Superintendent's Suspension, wherein the student is removed from the school and must attend classes at something known as an Alternative Instruction Site for up to 90 days. Students who have received a Superintendent's Suspension have been found guilty (via a disciplinary hearing) of crimes ranging from destruction of school property to arson. In order to attend that hearing, the dean, or a member of the administration, must enter the occurrence into the DOE's discipline computer database and wait for approval. What am I getting at here?

The Superintendent of the District, the man who is in charge of 15 schools, 50+ administrators and thousands of students, did not even have the power to suspend a student who completely and fully admitted to throwing a bottle which caused massive damage to a brand new automobile. A week later, and the girl is still at school, attending classes, and basically mocking the disciplinary procedures of the Department of Education to anyone who will listen.

Oh, but it gets better. The Superintendent, in his blind rage, demanded that the Principal investigate the teacher who was in charge of the class during the incident in question. Since he's the boss, she had no choice but to acquiesce to his demand. So, that's why this past Thursday, the teacher in question, the Principal, and I sat in her office and discussed the incident. Remember, I am the teachers' representative and am to be present at all proceedings, meetings, or discussions which may negatively impact their careers. The teacher, a 17-year Veteran, calmly recounted the incident, which went a little something like this.

Teacher notices that the student has a glass bottle in her possession (something that is banned by the DOE). Teacher tells the student six times (yes, six) to put it away or throw it out. The student ignores him, and five minutes later, throws the bottle out of the window.

The Principal listens to his story, nods her head, and tells us both that the entire meeting was just "procedural" and that the teacher shouldn't worry.

The next day, the teacher receives a letter in his permanent personnel file which states that he has been "Found negligent in the incident which led to the destruction of property, as he should have physically removed the bottle from the student's possession." We are told time and again never to physically confiscate any contraband from a student, as that student could turn around and claim that he was "injured" during the removal, and sue the school and the teacher.

So, to recap: Student destroys the windshield of a brand new car belonging to the Superintendent of Schools. Superintendent is powerless to suspend said student, and she remains on school grounds. Instead, Principal places a disciplinary letter into the file of the classroom teacher for not engaging in a disciplinary action that he has been told not to take against students.

And you thought it was just the school budgets that are fucked?


Anonymous said…
Dear Cunt,
Please die in a fire. You are human garbage personified.
Valannin said…
Dear Anonymous,

Statcounter tells me where you live.

rajg said…
Good god Val, I love your posts! Yes, I did find out about you from your reviews. I must say that witty personalities such as yours are few and far between in the great void of cyberspace.

I'm not a teacher, but had to just go through 13 years of bullshit myself. I still find it humorously sad that our counselors kept feeding us lies about how these were "the best years of our lives." State testing made me want to shove a pen in my eye. Luckily, graduation was last month. Things will certainly get better.

As for Anon, he's another one of those sad keyboard warriors that masturbates in his musty basement all day after posting dumb comments on obscure blogs. Sad, because he realizes the truth that society doesn't need him, and doesn't want him.

Anyways, toodles.
tiagombp said…
Hey, we are anxiously waiting for Mr. Outcast's take on those new national education standards! What's your opinion??
Anonymous said…
Not one text in 4 months! I just you are writing a book..
Anonymous said…
One need not have a PhD in Clinical Psychology to make informed statements about this [HPV vaccine] subject matter. In fact, I could argue that your opinions are no more informed than mine, since your PhD is not in pharmacology. With that said, did you obtain your PhD for self-gratification, to impress others or for income-earning potential? I suspect the reason was the former, since teaching at a Bronx school, even with a PhD, will not get you even close to a six-figure annual salary. You claim you have studied the Vioxx and Celebrex cases, yet you seem to dismiss these corrupt clinical trials and in the same sentence (or paragraph) continue to praise and defend the pharmaceutical industry, the FDA and CDC. If you had truly done your research, then you would also admit that the FDA is widely known as being among the most corrupt U.S. federal agencies. Do you even know anything about the L-tryptophan debacle in the 1990s? I suspect that was a little before your enlightened time. But, do not take my “uninformed” word, as you put it, since “this is not my area of expertise.” Do your own research and then come back and post your more “informed” findings on similar topics. Please put that PhD to harder work.
Valannin said…
Wow, stalk much? Talk about insecurity...People who are right educate others. People who are wrong attempt to convince. You fall into the latter category.

Salary (which is more than close)+ Book residuals = all I need. You should see what an advance is worth these days.
Anonymous said…
Pardon my "stalking." I am just getting a little aroused by our dialogue. Can you psychoanalyse me further? Notice that I am using U.N. English, for those with an "international" bent. I am feeling lonely and isolated here in California living amongst so many illegal aliens whom are now getting free money from the taxpayers due to the Dream Act. But, the sane Californians will overturn this nonsensical law. Cheers.

Popular posts from this blog

All empty souls tend toward extreme opinions (W. B. Yeats)

Something occurred to me as I was having a conversation with a friend today, (she’s definitely one of the Outcast by the way), when she mentioned that I wasn’t very “open-minded.” The phrase “open-minded” is perhaps the most aggravating and deceptive American axioms ever invented. Why? Because it’s a trap. The only reason people see others as not “open-minded” is because they are not in agreement about a particular subject. If someone says, “I don’t think the U.S. ever put a man on the moon,” I’d disagree, because there’s tons of evidence to the contrary. But then I’d be met with the dreaded “you need to be more open-minded!” Well, shouldn’t they have the same level of open-mindedness? Of course not. Because in their lexicon, “open-minded” means “believing any old bit of nonsense as long as it goes against tradition.” Cold, hard facts scare these people, so they hide behind the gilded shield of “opinions.”

To be honest, I don’t believe there are any such things as opinions. There are f…